Is The Lack Of Multiplay In The Order:1886 A Dealbreaker

Since I am dealing with a cold and wanted to get this out, I opted to do a voice recording of my opinion piece so hopefully you will like this. I would also like to know if you prefer written reviews to audio reviews and opinion pieces as I am debating if the staff and I should do more audio ones in an effort to increase our output and turn around times.

 

 

[soundcloud url="https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/187658173" params="auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true" width="100%" height="450" iframe="true" /]

2 Comments

  1. Truth said:

    The answer is yes. This game will be a 10 hour cinematic failure at 800p and 30fps. No multiplayer whatsoever (either co-op or competitive) is just icing on the turd.

    January 25, 2015
    • gareth said:

      It is interesting how much negativity there is to the game pre-release. At first I put it to the bashing that happens between Xbox and PS supporters who often take shots at the exclusive titles of the systems. That being said, I think there have been some interesting and valid concerns about the game. Issues ranging from game length, frame rates and control systems, gameplay style, and a lack of multiplay do seem to be what fans are concerned about. Someone said to me that this was a non-issue and a stupid topic yet judging from the comments on N4G and a those sent to me, this is a very valid issue.

      January 25, 2015

Comments are closed.